Add your promotional text...
The Complete Guide to Global Hiring Without an Entity
Hiring talent globally no longer requires setting up a legal entity in every country.
Today, startups and enterprises alike hire employees across borders using alternative models that are faster, more flexible, and — when used correctly — fully compliant.
This guide explains how to hire internationally without a local entity, the models available, their costs and risks, and how to choose the right approach based on your company stage, geography, and long-term plans.
If you’re expanding globally and want speed without regulatory mistakes, start here.
What Does “Hiring Without an Entity” Mean?
Hiring without an entity means employing or engaging workers in a country where your company does not have a registered legal presence.
Instead of incorporating locally, companies rely on third-party structures or legal frameworks to stay compliant.
This approach is increasingly common because entity setup:
Takes months
Requires local directors, bank accounts, and filings
Creates long-term tax and compliance obligations
For many teams, entities are premature.
Why Companies Choose to Hire Without an Entity
Speed to Hire
Entity setup can take 3–6 months. Alternative models allow hiring in days or weeks.
Lower Upfront Cost
Avoid incorporation fees, legal retainers, accounting, and ongoing statutory filings.
Market Testing
Hire locally to validate demand before committing to a permanent presence.
Flexibility
Exit a market or change strategy without entity wind-down complexity.
The 4 Models for Hiring Without an Entity
There are four primary ways companies hire internationally without entities. Each has trade-offs.
Employer of Record (EOR)
An Employer of Record legally employs workers on your behalf.
The EOR:
Is the legal employer
Issues compliant contracts
Runs payroll and benefits
Manages taxes and labor law compliance
You:
Direct the employee’s work
Control role, salary, and performance
Best for: Full-time employees, fast expansion, small teams per country.
Independent Contractors
Contractors are self-employed individuals or businesses.
Pros:
Fast engagement
Lower short-term cost
Cons:
High misclassification risk
Limited control
Not suitable for core roles
Many countries strictly regulate contractor use.
Professional Employer Organizations (PEOs)
PEOs provide HR and payroll services but typically require you to have a local entity.
In a few regions, quasi-PEO models exist — but coverage is limited.
Best for: Companies with existing entities (not true entity-free hiring).
Local Partners & Staffing Firms
Some companies use local agencies or partners.
Risks:
IP ownership issues
Loss of control
Higher long-term cost
Often unsuitable for knowledge-based roles.
Employer of Record (EOR): The Most Common Entity-Free Model
EORs are the most widely used solution for hiring employees without entities.
How EOR Hiring Works
You select a candidate
The EOR employs them locally
Payroll, taxes, and benefits are handled
You receive a monthly invoice
From the employee’s view, the EOR is the employer. From yours, it’s a compliance layer.
Contractors vs EOR: A Critical Distinction
Many companies default to contractors to avoid cost.
This creates risk when:
Work is full-time
Hours are fixed
Tools and equipment are company-owned
Work is supervised
Misclassification penalties can exceed EOR costs many times over.
Cost Comparison: Entity vs EOR vs Contractors
EORs are often the lowest-risk option for early-stage international hiring.
Compliance Risks When Hiring Without an Entity
Entity-free hiring does not eliminate compliance obligations.
Key Risks to Understand
Worker misclassification
Permanent establishment (PE) risk
Tax withholding errors
Data privacy violations
Improper terminations
Choosing the right model reduces — but does not remove — these risks.
Country Differences Matter More Than You Think
Hiring rules vary widely by country:
Germany: strong employee protections, long notice periods
India: complex payroll compliance, contractor misuse common
UK: IR35 rules for contractors
UAE: end-of-service gratuity requirements
Entity-free hiring must be evaluated country by country.
Cost Comparison: Entity vs EOR vs Contractors
EORs are often the lowest-risk option for early-stage international hiring.
Compliance Risks When Hiring Without an Entity
Entity-free hiring does not eliminate compliance obligations.
Key Risks to Understand
Worker misclassification
Permanent establishment (PE) risk
Tax withholding errors
Data privacy violations
Improper terminations
Choosing the right model reduces — but does not remove — these risks.
Country Differences Matter More Than You Think
Hiring rules vary widely by country:
Germany: strong employee protections, long notice periods
India: complex payroll compliance, contractor misuse common
UK: IR35 rules for contractors
UAE: end-of-service gratuity requirements
Entity-free hiring must be evaluated country by country.
info@peopleandfinance.org
